Sensory Processing Disorder and ASD

According to a policy statement from the section on Complementary and Integrative Medicine of the American Academy of Pediatrics Sensory Processing Disorder should not be used as a medical diagnosis. They express concern with it's overuse, and the application of sensory based therapies for which there is little if any evidence of effectiveness. Regretfully, even with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder or Asleger's Syndrome many school district produce IEPs (Individual Education Plans) that rely heavily on these unproven treatment- while they avoid the use of validated behavioural treatments. Often the reason for this is that sensory based treatments are easier to implement with untrained staff, and there is simply a lack of trained professionals in the field of behavioural interventions (or classroom management). Click http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/GeneralPediatrics/33018 for the full story The statement says, "Pediatricians should not use sensory processing disorder as a diagnosis, according to a policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Although there are standardized measures of a child's sensory processing abilities, there is not a widely accepted framework for diagnosing the disorder, members of the AAP's Section on Complementary and Integrative Medicine wrote in the June issue of Pediatrics." The reort notes, "that the committee developing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) has called for further research before officially recognizing sensory processing disorder." In addition, the authors wrote, "it is unclear whether children who present with sensory-based problems have an actual 'disorder' of the sensory pathways of the brain or whether these deficits are characteristics associated with other developmental and behavioral disorders." The report suggests that instead of diagnosing sensory processing disorder, pediatricians should perform a thorough evaluation -- usually with appropriate referral to a developmental and behavioral pediatrician, child psychiatrist, or child psychologist. The report continues, "consideration should be given to other developmental and behavioral disorders that may be associated with difficulty tolerating or processing sensory information, including autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), developmental coordination disorders, and childhood anxiety disorders." "Pediatricians should inform families that occupational therapy is a limited resource, particularly the number of sessions available through schools and through insurance coverage," the authors wrote. "The family, pediatrician, and other clinicians should work together to prioritize treatment on the basis of the effects the sensory problems have on a child's ability to perform daily functions of childhood." Here in Bc there has been tremendous growth in school based "sensory rooms." Often children with ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder or Asperger's Syndrome are removed from class and sent to the "sensory rooms" in an effort to calm them down, rather than the school completing an appropriate Functional Behavioral Assessment and developing a behavior based intervention plan that either teaches new skills or uses behavioural techniques (long known about and familiar to experts in the field) such as controlled exposure, relaxation and thought stopping interventions to teach the child appropriate ways to deal with unwanted sensory input. Little effort is made to help the child develop coping skills, self-southing skills or other alternative behavioural skills to deal with the sensory issues. Many parents feel that the over use of sensory rooms and removal from the teaching environment do little more than reinforce inappropriate and unwanted behaviours. A second look at the over use of the "sensory Processing Disorder" diagnosis seems like an appropriate place to start. While here in BC excessive removal from a classroom (Time Out / Time Away) due to behavioural issues seems acceptable. In the United States such removal would be considered a "change in educational placement" and would require approval by both the school special education team and parents. An excellent source of information on how behaviours that interfere with learning should be addressed in the classroom through well know and scientifically supported educational and behavioural techniques can be found at this web page: http://www.pent.ca.gov The PENT website offers free materials which any school district could use to address problematic behaviours which interfere with learning. An appropriate Functional Behavioural Assessment (FBA) is the place to start when addressing these kinds of issues. I have used the PENT training materials to implement training programs in completing and writing Functional Behavioural Assessments for almost 10 years and it is really unmatched ....and FREE. All of these training materials are....FREE. Rather than providing easy interventions that are not supported by science. I would hope that every school instead provides science based assessment and intervention programs that directly assess the behaviours of concern and use interventions techniques we know work. The problem comes down to this: If your child has a serious behavioural problem at school, you should expect that the school would implement strong, science based interventions that are designed to directly address the problem AND teach new adaptive behaviours. Changing the child's environment, and removing them from the classroom, is not a plan. Sensory room or not. If your having such problems with your child in school I would suggest contacting an expert in the field, a psychologist or professional educator, to visit the school, observe the situation and complete an FBA (Functional Behavioural Assessment)